We
will look at a function from earlier and see how it is evaluated
for Concavity.
The
function is: ¦
(x)= 7x4 - 24x3 + 10x2 + 24x
– 17
The
1st Derivative:¦’(x)= 28x3 – 72x2 + 20x + 24
The
2nd Derivative ¦”=
84x2 – 144x + 20 «
4(21 x2 – 36x + 5)
Where
it will be zero for Concave UP È
or Concave DOWN Ç.
4(21
x2 – 36x + 5) = 0 à
Quadratic
formula à
x= (36 +or- (362 – 4(21)(5))½)/ 42
x=0.1524453
and x=1.56184 à
now set these as intervals.
This
is a table of the intervals
(-¥,
0.1524),
|
(0.152,
1.56184)
|
(1.56184,
¥)
|
(¦’’(-3)=Pos)
|
(¦’’(1)=Neg)
|
(¦’’(5)=Pos)
|
Concave
UP È
|
Concave
DOWN Ç,
|
Concave
UP È
|
|
|
|
Another example of
Determining Concavity:
¦
(x)= 6/(x² + 3)«
6(x² + 3)-1
¦’(x)=
(-6)( x² + 3)-2 (2x) «
-12x/(x² + 3)²
¦”(x)=
[(x² + 3)²(-12)-(-12x)(2)( x² + 3)(2x)]/( x² + 3)³
= [36(x² +-1)]/(x² + 3)³
Because
¦”(x)
= 0 when x = ±
1 and ¦”
is defined on the entire real
line, you should test ¦”
on the intervals (-¥,
-1), (-1,1), and (1,¥).
The results are shown in the table:
(-¥,
-1),
|
(-1,
1)
|
(1,
¥)
|
¦’’(-2) > 0
|
¦’’(0) < 0
|
(¦’’(2) > 0
|
Concave
UP È
|
Concave
DOWN Ç,
|
Concave
UP È
|
|
|
|
Points
of Inflection
The
Concavity of ¦
changes at a point of inflection.
THEOREM
3.8 - Points of Inflection
If (c, ¦(c))
is a point of inflection on the graph of ¦,
then either ¦”(c)=
0 pr ¦
is not differentiable at x = c.
þ
¦
(x)= 3x4 –4x³ on interval [-1,2]
þ
For Critical Numbers get 1st
derivative and set to zero
þ
¦’(x)
= 12x³-12x²
þ
0= 12x(x-1)
therefore: x=0,x=1 (Critical Numbers)
þ
Now consider all point,
the Critical and the End points.
þ
¦(-1)=
3x4 –4x³ = 7 Þ
(-1,7)
þ
¦(0)=
3x4 –4x³ =
0 Þ
(0,0)
þ
¦(1)=
3x4 –4x³ =
-1 Þ
(1, -1)Þ
Minimum
þ
¦(2)=
3x4 –4x³ =
16 Þ
(2,16)Þ
Maximum
þ
Now we look at derivative
of ¦’(x)
= 12x³-12x² which is the second derivative of ¦(x)=
3x4 –4x³
þ
¦”
(x)= 12x² – 24 «
12x(x –2)
þ
Set ¦”(x)
= 0, you can determine that
the possible points of inflection occur at x=0 and x=2.
By testing the intervals determined by these x- values, you
can conclude that they both yield points of inflection.
þ
Here is the Table:
þ
Interval
|
-
¥
< x < 0
|
0
< x < 2
|
2
< x < ¥
|
Test value
|
X
= - 1
|
X
= 1
|
X
= 3
|
Sign of ¦”
(x)
|
¦”
(-1) > 0
|
¦”
(1) < 0
|
¦”
(3) > 0
|
Conclusion
|
Concave
UP È
|
Concave
DOWN Ç,
|
Concave
UP È
|
Using
the 2nd Derivative Test.
In addition to
testing for concavity, the 2nd Derivative Test
can be used to perform a simple test for relative maxima &
minima.
THEOREM
3.9 – Second Derivative Test
Let
¦
be a function such that ¦’(c)=
0 and the 2nd derivative of ¦
exists on an open interval containing c.
1.
If ¦”(c)>
0, then ¦”(c)
is a relative minimum.
2.
If ¦”(c)<
0, then ¦”(c)
is a relative maximum.
3.
If ¦”(c)=
0, the test fails. In
such cases, you use the 1st Derivative Test.
Another example
using the 2nd Derivative Test.
Find the relative
extrema for ¦
(x) = -3x5 + 5x³
Solution: Begin by
finding the critical numbers of ¦.
¦′(c)=
-15x4 + 15x² «
15x²(1 - x²)= 0
Critical numbers:
x=-1,0,1
Using the 2nd
Der: ¦”(c)=
-60x³ + 30x «
= 30(-2x³ + x)
Point
|
(-1,
-2)
|
(1,2)
|
(0,0)
|
Sign of ¦”
(x)
|
¦”
(-1) > 0
|
¦”
(1) < 0
|
¦”
(0) = 0
|
Conclusion
|
Relative
minimum
|
Relative
maximum
|
Test
fails
|
Because the 2nd
Derivative Test fails at (0,0), you can use the 1st
Derivative Test and observe that ¦
é
to the left and the right of x=0.
SO, 90,0) is neither a relative min nor a relative max.
|